Quoting Sricharan R (2018-06-01 06:20:37)

Hi Stephen,

On 5/31/2018 1:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Ok. One general comment is that it would be nice if the bindings for all
the nodes that are introduced included 'clocks' properties and also
maybe 'clock-names' properties for the clocks that are consumed by each
node. Right now, we hide those details from DT and rely on the string
names to hook the clk tree up for us. That sort of prevents us from
moving away from string easily, so I would just throw the clocks into
the binding right now and always have them there just in case we want to
use the binding to figure out the hierarchy in the future.

 ok, understand that mostly. So will try to revamp those patches with
 the 'clocks' property in the binding added, reading them in the driver
 from DT.

Yeah. You don't even have to actually use the clocks property right now
from the drivers. Just add the properties in the binding.