Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2018-05-31

Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] drivers/i2c: Add transfer implementation for FSI algorithm

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-30 00:08:10
Also in: linux-i2c, lkml

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Eddie James [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Edward A. James" <redacted>

Execute I2C transfers from the FSI-attached I2C master. Use polling
instead of interrupts as we have no hardware IRQ over FSI.
+       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+               cmd |= I2C_CMD_READ;
I think we have a helper for this, though not sure.
+static int fsi_i2c_write_fifo(struct fsi_i2c_port *port, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+                             u8 fifo_count)
+{
+       int write;
+       int rc = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+       struct fsi_i2c_master *i2c = port->master;
+       int bytes_to_write = i2c->fifo_size - fifo_count;
+       int bytes_remaining = msg->len - port->xfrd;
+       if (bytes_to_write > bytes_remaining)
+               bytes_to_write = bytes_remaining;
_write = min(_write, _remaining);
+       while (bytes_to_write > 0) {
+               write = bytes_to_write;
+               /* fsi limited to max 4 byte aligned ops */
+               if (bytes_to_write > 4)
+                       write = 4;
+               else if (write == 3)
+                       write = 2;
write = min_t(int, 4, rounddown_pow_of_two(bytes_to_write));

Also check it carefully, it might be optimized even more, though I
didn't think much.
+       }
+       return rc;
How it can be non-zero?
+}
+
+static int fsi_i2c_read_fifo(struct fsi_i2c_port *port, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+                            u8 fifo_count)
+{
+       int read;
+       int rc = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+       struct fsi_i2c_master *i2c = port->master;
+       int xfr_remaining = msg->len - port->xfrd;
+       u32 dummy;
+
+       while (fifo_count) {
+               read = fifo_count;
+               /* fsi limited to max 4 byte aligned ops */
+               if (fifo_count > 4)
+                       read = 4;
+               else if (read == 3)
+                       read = 2;
See above for write case and do in similar way.
+
+               if (xfr_remaining) {
+                       if (xfr_remaining < read)
+                               read = xfr_remaining;
read = min(read, _remaining);
+
+                       rc = fsi_device_read(i2c->fsi, I2C_FSI_FIFO,
+                                            &msg->buf[port->xfrd], read);
+                       if (rc)
+                               return rc;
+
+                       port->xfrd += read;
+                       xfr_remaining -= read;
+               } else {
+                       /* no more buffer but data in fifo, need to clear it */
+                       rc = fsi_device_read(i2c->fsi, I2C_FSI_FIFO, &dummy,
+                                            read);
+                       if (rc)
+                               return rc;
+               }
+
+               fifo_count -= read;
+       }
+
+       return rc;
How non-zero possible here?
+}
+               if (port->xfrd < msg->len)
+                       rc = -ENODATA;
+               else
+                       rc = msg->len;
+
+               return rc;
if (...)
  return -ENODATA;
return msg->len;
 ?
+       u32 status = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+       return -ETIME;
ETIMEDOUT ?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help