Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] drivers/i2c: Add transfer implementation for FSI algorithm
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-30 00:08:10
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Eddie James [off-list ref] wrote:
From: "Edward A. James" <redacted> Execute I2C transfers from the FSI-attached I2C master. Use polling instead of interrupts as we have no hardware IRQ over FSI.
+ if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) + cmd |= I2C_CMD_READ;
I think we have a helper for this, though not sure.
+static int fsi_i2c_write_fifo(struct fsi_i2c_port *port, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+ u8 fifo_count)
+{
+ int write;+ int rc = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+ struct fsi_i2c_master *i2c = port->master; + int bytes_to_write = i2c->fifo_size - fifo_count; + int bytes_remaining = msg->len - port->xfrd;
+ if (bytes_to_write > bytes_remaining) + bytes_to_write = bytes_remaining;
_write = min(_write, _remaining);
+ while (bytes_to_write > 0) {+ write = bytes_to_write; + /* fsi limited to max 4 byte aligned ops */ + if (bytes_to_write > 4) + write = 4; + else if (write == 3) + write = 2;
write = min_t(int, 4, rounddown_pow_of_two(bytes_to_write)); Also check it carefully, it might be optimized even more, though I didn't think much.
+ }
+ return rc;
How it can be non-zero?
+}
+
+static int fsi_i2c_read_fifo(struct fsi_i2c_port *port, struct i2c_msg *msg,
+ u8 fifo_count)
+{
+ int read;+ int rc = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+ struct fsi_i2c_master *i2c = port->master;
+ int xfr_remaining = msg->len - port->xfrd;
+ u32 dummy;
+
+ while (fifo_count) {+ read = fifo_count; + /* fsi limited to max 4 byte aligned ops */ + if (fifo_count > 4) + read = 4; + else if (read == 3) + read = 2;
See above for write case and do in similar way.
+
+ if (xfr_remaining) {+ if (xfr_remaining < read) + read = xfr_remaining;
read = min(read, _remaining);
+
+ rc = fsi_device_read(i2c->fsi, I2C_FSI_FIFO,
+ &msg->buf[port->xfrd], read);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ port->xfrd += read;
+ xfr_remaining -= read;
+ } else {
+ /* no more buffer but data in fifo, need to clear it */
+ rc = fsi_device_read(i2c->fsi, I2C_FSI_FIFO, &dummy,
+ read);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ fifo_count -= read;
+ }
++ return rc;
How non-zero possible here?
+}
+ if (port->xfrd < msg->len) + rc = -ENODATA; + else + rc = msg->len; + + return rc;
if (...) return -ENODATA; return msg->len; ?
+ u32 status = 0;
Redundant assignment.
+ return -ETIME;
ETIMEDOUT ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko