On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:30:53PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 03/12/2018 02:57 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ /* attempt to find a phy-handle */
+ if (!(bp->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0))) {
+
+ /* fallback to standard phy registration if no phy were
+ * found during dt phy registration
+ */
+ if (!phy_find_first(bp->mii_bus)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
+ struct phy_device *phydev;
+
+ phydev = mdiobus_scan(bp->mii_bus, i);
+ if (IS_ERR(phydev) &&
+ PTR_ERR(phydev) != -ENODEV) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(phydev);
+ break;
+ }
Hi Brad
I would be a bit relaxed on these warnings because the existing function
indentation really makes it easy to be over 80 columns. Unless you have
a preliminary patch which, as I was suggesting earlier, re-arranges the
branches such that if (!np) is the first thing you test, I don't see how
this can look any better...
I'll try to work this a bit more, thanks for the feedback and the
patience.
--
Brad