Quoting Mike Looijmans (2018-03-19 08:04:15)

On 18-03-18 13:52, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:

quoted

+Required properties:
+ - compatible: One of "silabs,si514a", "silabs,si514b" "silabs,si514c" according
+               to the speed grade of the chip.
+ - reg: I2C device address.
+ - #clock-cells: From common clock bindings: Shall be 0.
+
+Optional properties:
+ - clock-output-names: From common clock bindings. Recommended to be "si544".

What's the point if there is only 1 clock output?

I have a board with 6 of these chips, and the clock registration fails if they 
don't have unique names. Providing a clock-output-names property was the 
easiest way around it.

Should I just omit the line or change the wording to reflect the above or is 
there a better solution (maybe I can use the DT node name as clock name in the 
driver, will look into that)

I would leave clock-output-names for now. One day we can get off of
strings in CCF. Soon perhaps.

quoted

quoted

+
+Example:
+    si544: clock-generator@55 {

clock-controller@55 is the standard node name.

I'll change and post patch v3

I made some comments on v1. Please fold those into v3.