On 2/15/2018 6:22 AM, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:

+static void of_populate_phandle_cache(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u32 cache_entries;
+	struct device_node *np;
+	u32 phandles = 0;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
+
+	kfree(phandle_cache);
+	phandle_cache = NULL;
+
+	for_each_of_allnodes(np)
+		if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
+			phandles++;
+
+	cache_entries = roundup_pow_of_two(phandles);
+	phandle_cache_mask = cache_entries - 1;
+
+	phandle_cache = kcalloc(cache_entries, sizeof(*phandle_cache),
+				GFP_ATOMIC);
+

NULL check of phandle_cache would be good to have.

+	for_each_of_allnodes(np)
+		if (np->phandle && np->phandle != OF_PHANDLE_ILLEGAL)
+			phandle_cache[np->phandle & phandle_cache_mask] = np;
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
+}

Chintan
-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project