Am 21.02.2018 um 20:13 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add gpio driver for Actions Semi OWL family S900 SoC. Set of registers
controlling the gpio shares the same register range with pinctrl block.

GPIO registers are organized as 6 banks and each bank controls the
maximum of 32 gpios.

quoted

+static void owl_gpio_set_reg(void __iomem *base, unsigned int pin, int flag)
+{
+       u32 val;
+
+       if (flag) {
+               val = readl(base);
+               val |= BIT(pin);
+               writel(val, base);
+       } else {
+               val = readl(base);
+               val &= ~BIT(pin);
+               writel(val, base);
+       }
+}

Why not to use the same pattern as below?

readl()
if ()
 ...
else
...
writel()

?

And shouldn't that be readl_relaxed() and writel_relaxed()?

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel