Am 21.02.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:

Hi Rob,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 02:35:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 02:14:28AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:

quoted

Add gpio nodes for Actions Semi S900 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt         | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4cd4cb7bfd1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+* Actions Semi OWL GPIO controller bindings
+
+- compatible      : Should be "actions,s900-gpio"
+- reg             : Address and range of the GPIO controller registers.
+- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
+- #gpio-cells     : Should be <2>. The first cell is the gpio number and
+                    the second cell is used to specify optional parameters.

Doesn't do interrupts?

Interrupt support will be added once this base driver gets in.
One step at a time ;-)

Rob rejected that step-by-step approach for my RDA Micro bindings, which
is why it is currently stuck. ;)

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel