On Thu 14 Dec 09:33 PST 2017, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:

+static inline int q6dsp_map_channels(u8 *ch_map, int ch)
+{
+	memset(ch_map, 0, PCM_FORMAT_MAX_NUM_CHANNEL);

This implies that ch_map is always an array of
PCM_FORMAT_MAX_NUM_CHANNEL elements. As such it would be better to
express this in the prototype; i.e u8 ch_map[PCM_FORMAT_MAX_NUM_CHANNEL]

+
+	if (ch == 1) {

This is a switch statement.

+		ch_map[0] = PCM_CHANNEL_FC;
+	} else if (ch == 2) {

[..]

+struct adsp_err_code {
+	int		lnx_err_code;

Indentation, and these could be given more succinct names.

+	char	*adsp_err_str;
+};
+
+static struct adsp_err_code adsp_err_code_info[ADSP_ERR_MAX+1] = {
+	{ 0, ADSP_EOK_STR},
+	{ -ENOTRECOVERABLE, ADSP_EFAILED_STR},
+	{ -EINVAL, ADSP_EBADPARAM_STR},
+	{ -ENOSYS, ADSP_EUNSUPPORTED_STR},
+	{ -ENOPROTOOPT, ADSP_EVERSION_STR},
+	{ -ENOTRECOVERABLE, ADSP_EUNEXPECTED_STR},
+	{ -ENOTRECOVERABLE, ADSP_EPANIC_STR},
+	{ -ENOSPC, ADSP_ENORESOURCE_STR},
+	{ -EBADR, ADSP_EHANDLE_STR},
+	{ -EALREADY, ADSP_EALREADY_STR},
+	{ -EPERM, ADSP_ENOTREADY_STR},
+	{ -EINPROGRESS, ADSP_EPENDING_STR},
+	{ -EBUSY, ADSP_EBUSY_STR},
+	{ -ECANCELED, ADSP_EABORTED_STR},
+	{ -EAGAIN, ADSP_EPREEMPTED_STR},
+	{ -EAGAIN, ADSP_ECONTINUE_STR},
+	{ -EAGAIN, ADSP_EIMMEDIATE_STR},
+	{ -EAGAIN, ADSP_ENOTIMPL_STR},
+	{ -ENODATA, ADSP_ENEEDMORE_STR},
+	{ -EADV, ADSP_ERR_MAX_STR},

This, element 0x13, is not listed among the defined errors. Is this a
placeholder?

How about making this even more descriptive by using the format

[ADSP_EBADPARAM] = { -EINVAL, ADSP_EBADPARAM_STR },

That way the mapping table is self-describing.

And you can use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of specifying the fixed size of
ADSP_ERR_MAX + 1...

+	{ -ENOMEM, ADSP_ENOMEMORY_STR},
+	{ -ENODEV, ADSP_ENOTEXIST_STR},
+	{ -EADV, ADSP_ERR_MAX_STR},

"Advertise error"?

+};
+
+static inline int adsp_err_get_lnx_err_code(u32 adsp_error)

Can this be made internal to some c-file? So that any third party deals
only with linux error codes?


How about renaming this q6dsp_errno()?

+{
+	if (adsp_error > ADSP_ERR_MAX)
+		return adsp_err_code_info[ADSP_ERR_MAX].lnx_err_code;
+	else
+		return adsp_err_code_info[adsp_error].lnx_err_code;

I think this would look better if you assign a local variable and have a
single return. And just hard code the "invalid error code" errno, rather
than looking up ADSP_ERR_MAX in the list.

+}
+
+static inline char *adsp_err_get_err_str(u32 adsp_error)

q6dsp_strerror(), to match strerror(3)?

+{
+	if (adsp_error > ADSP_ERR_MAX)
+		return adsp_err_code_info[ADSP_ERR_MAX].adsp_err_str;
+	else
+		return adsp_err_code_info[adsp_error].adsp_err_str;

And I do think that, as with strerror, this should return a human
readable error, not the stringified define.

+}

I'm puzzled to why these helper functions lives in a header file, at
least some aspects of this would better be hidden...

Regards,
Bjorn