Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-12-27

Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] dt-bindings: net: Add DT bindings for Socionext Netsec

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2017-12-27 08:28:47
Also in: netdev

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:34:26AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 12/21/2017 05:55 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
+- mdio device tree subnode: When the Netsec has a phy connected to its local
+		mdio, there must be device tree subnode with the following
+		required properties:
+
+	- compatible: Must be "socionext,snq-mdio".
Is there a need for a compatible string? Is there different versions
of the MDIO bus hardware? If it was an independent MDIO bus driver,
then yes, you need a compatible string. But since it is embedded in
the MAC driver, there should not be a need.
I don't see a problem with doing that though, it may be extra
information, but if we ever have a standalone MDIO bus controller that
happens to be supported by the same HW/driver, and the Ethernet driver
delegates the MDIO management to this MDIO bus driver, then having the
compatible string is kind of mandatory for proper matching/identification.
Hi Florian

I does not create a problem. It does however make it different to
every other embedded MDIO bus.

My preference is not to have the compatible string, but i can live
with it.

      Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help