Hi Fabio,
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:28:08AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Gary Bisson
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
What about naming it i2c2mux and i2c3mux so it is clearer those mux
happen respectively for i2c2 and i2c3?
Then I'd rename the sub-nodes i2cXmux@Y instead of i2cX@Y currently.
Let me know your thoughts.
Is this what you suggest?
Yes exactly, I find it clearer, what do you think?
Regards,
Gary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html