Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 6 authors, 2017-12-26

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: at24: add a missing compatible

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-21 14:58:58
Also in: linux-i2c, lkml

2017-12-21 15:25 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
2017-12-21 15:08 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
"atmel,spd" is reported by checkpatch as undocumented in the device
tree bindings. Add it to the list of supported compatible strings.
quoted
         "atmel,24c00",
         "atmel,24c01",
         "atmel,24c02",
+        "atmel,spd",
         "atmel,24c04",
         "atmel,24c08",
         "atmel,24c16",
Sounds alogical to me to make a split by this new record.
Can you find better line to inject?
quoted
They are actually ordered by memory size. I want to keep it like this
in the driver and I prefer that the DT reflect it.
So, I just disagree on the above. Rationale I described at one of the comment.

At the end it's your call, but from my p.o.v. it makes life harder to
read and catch the chips which are (un)supported.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Yes, I prefer this version. Another reason to keep it like this is to
group chip variants together. E.g: atmel,24cs02, atmel,spd,
atmel,24mac402, atmel,24mac602 are all variants of atmel,24c02.

Thanks,
Bartosz
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help