Re: [PATCH 03/20] ARM: dts: aspeed-g4: Correct VUART IRQ number
From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date: 2017-12-11 10:45:13
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-aspeed, lkml
From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date: 2017-12-11 10:45:13
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-aspeed, lkml
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Joel Stanley [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This should have always been 8. Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>As this is a bugfix, should we backport it to stable kernels? When you fix a bug, I generally recommend including a 'Fixes' tag with the commit ID of the patch that introduced the problem, and either a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag if you want it backported, or an explanation in the changelog why it should not get backported. This really helps Greg and the other stable maintainers trying to make a decision what to backport and what not.
We could do this, and I generally follow the practice of adding Fixes tags. I hadn't because without an upstream clock driver, the Aspeed port is not usable by anyone without making modifications. We're really depending on getting that code merged. I will send it as a fix to 4.15. Do you mind taking individual patches for the arm dt tree, or would you prefer a pull request? Cheers, Joel