Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 3 authors, 2017-12-11

Re: [PATCH 03/20] ARM: dts: aspeed-g4: Correct VUART IRQ number

From: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Date: 2017-12-11 10:45:13
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-aspeed, lkml

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Joel Stanley [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This should have always been 8.

Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
As this is a bugfix, should we backport it to stable kernels? When you
fix a bug,
I generally recommend including a 'Fixes' tag with the commit ID of the patch
that introduced the problem, and either a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag
if you want it backported, or an explanation in the changelog why it should
not get backported. This really helps Greg and the other stable maintainers
trying to make a decision what to backport and what not.
We could do this, and I generally follow the practice of adding Fixes
tags. I hadn't because without an upstream clock driver, the Aspeed
port is not usable by anyone without making modifications. We're
really depending on getting that code merged.

I will send it as a fix to 4.15. Do you mind taking individual patches
for the arm dt tree, or would you prefer a pull request?

Cheers,

Joel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help