Hi Sinan,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:04:49PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
implement the OF specific piece for it.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <redacted>
---
drivers/of/property.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 264c355..9964169 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -981,6 +981,12 @@ static int of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
return 0;
}
+void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+ struct device *dev)
static, as Rob mentioned.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+{
+ return (void *)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+}
+
const struct fwnode_operations of_fwnode_ops = {
.get = of_fwnode_get,
.put = of_fwnode_put,@@ -996,5 +1002,6 @@ static int of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
.graph_get_remote_endpoint = of_fwnode_graph_get_remote_endpoint,
.graph_get_port_parent = of_fwnode_graph_get_port_parent,
.graph_parse_endpoint = of_fwnode_graph_parse_endpoint,
+ .get_match_data = of_fwnode_get_match_data,
Please arrange right after device_is_available, the same applies to the
ACPI equivalent (5th patch).
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fwnode_ops);
With the above changes plus the ones in my comments on 3rd patch, on
patches 3--5:
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi