Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-10-27

Re: [PATCH v16 19/32] v4l: async: Ensure only unique fwnodes are registered to notifiers

From: Sakari Ailus <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-27 10:06:09
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-media
Subsystem: media input infrastructure (v4l/dvb), the rest, v4l2 async and fwnode frameworks · Maintainers: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Linus Torvalds, Sakari Ailus

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi Niklas,

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:52:27AM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
Hi Sakari,

Thanks for your patch.

On 2017-10-26 10:53:29 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
quoted
While registering a notifier, check that each newly added fwnode is
unique, and return an error if it is not. Also check that a newly added
notifier does not have the same fwnodes twice.

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <redacted>
---
 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index ed539c4fd5dc..b4e88eef195f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -308,8 +308,71 @@ static void v4l2_async_notifier_unbind_all_subdevs(
 	notifier->parent = NULL;
 }
 
+/* See if an fwnode can be found in a notifier's lists. */
+static bool __v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
+	struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+	struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
+	struct v4l2_subdev *sd;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(asd, &notifier->waiting, list) {
+		if (asd->match_type != V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE)
+			continue;
+
+		if (asd->match.fwnode.fwnode == fwnode)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry(sd, &notifier->done, async_list) {
+		if (WARN_ON(!sd->asd))
+			continue;
+
+		if (sd->asd->match_type != V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE)
+			continue;
+
+		if (sd->asd->match.fwnode.fwnode == fwnode)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Find out whether an async sub-device was set up for an fwnode already or
+ * whether it exists in a given notifier before @this_index.
+ */
+static bool v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
+	struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+	unsigned int this_index)
+{
+	unsigned int j;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&list_lock);
+
+	/* Check that an fwnode is not being added more than once. */
+	for (j = 0; j < this_index; j++) {
+		struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd = notifier->subdevs[this_index];
+		struct v4l2_async_subdev *other_asd = notifier->subdevs[j];
+
+		if (other_asd->match_type == V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE &&
+		    asd->match.fwnode.fwnode ==
+		    other_asd->match.fwnode.fwnode)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	/* Check than an fwnode did not exist in other notifiers. */
+	list_for_each_entry(notifier, &notifier_list, list)
+		if (__v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
+			    notifier, fwnode))
+			return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 {
+	struct device *dev =
+		notifier->v4l2_dev ? notifier->v4l2_dev->dev : NULL;
 	struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd;
 	int ret;
 	int i;
@@ -320,6 +383,8 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&notifier->waiting);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&notifier->done);
 
+	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < notifier->num_subdevs; i++) {
 		asd = notifier->subdevs[i];
 
@@ -327,19 +392,25 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 		case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_CUSTOM:
 		case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_DEVNAME:
 		case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_I2C:
+			break;
 		case V4L2_ASYNC_MATCH_FWNODE:
+			if (v4l2_async_notifier_fwnode_has_async_subdev(
+				    notifier, asd->match.fwnode.fwnode, i)) {
+				dev_err(dev,
+					"fwnode has already been registered or in notifier's subdev list\n");
+				ret = -EEXIST;
+				goto out_unlock;
You store the error code in ret before the jump, but in the out_unlock 
path ret is not considered and 0 is always returned.
quoted
+			}
 			break;
 		default:
-			dev_err(notifier->v4l2_dev ? notifier->v4l2_dev->dev : NULL,
-				"Invalid match type %u on %p\n",
+			dev_err(dev, "Invalid match type %u on %p\n",
 				asd->match_type, asd);
-			return -EINVAL;
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_unlock;
Same here.
Good catch! How about this change on top of the patch? It makes return
value checks a little bit safer, too.
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index b4e88eef195f..a33a68e5417b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -412,12 +412,13 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 	}
 
 	ret = v4l2_async_notifier_try_all_subdevs(notifier);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_unbind;
 
 	ret = v4l2_async_notifier_try_complete(notifier);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		goto err_unbind;
+	ret = 0;
 
 	/* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
 	list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 
 err_unbind:
 	/*
quoted
 		}
 		list_add_tail(&asd->list, &notifier->waiting);
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&list_lock);
-
 	ret = v4l2_async_notifier_try_all_subdevs(notifier);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_unbind;
@@ -351,6 +422,7 @@ static int __v4l2_async_notifier_register(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
 	/* Keep also completed notifiers on the list */
 	list_add(&notifier->list, &notifier_list);
 
+out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help