Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] pwm: mediatek: add MT2712/MT7622 support
From: m18063 <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-23 08:22:38
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-pwm, lkml
Hi Zhi, I have few comments regarding your patch. Please see them below. Thanks, Claudiu On 22.08.2017 05:09, Zhi Mao wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Add support to MT2712 and MT7622. Due to register offset address of pwm7 for MT2712 is not fixed 0x40, add mtk_pwm_reg_offset array for pwm register offset. Signed-off-by: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> --- drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c index 1d78ab1..ccd86e7 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/pwm.h> #include <linux/slab.h>@@ -40,11 +41,19 @@ enum { MTK_CLK_PWM3, MTK_CLK_PWM4, MTK_CLK_PWM5, + MTK_CLK_PWM6, + MTK_CLK_PWM7, + MTK_CLK_PWM8, MTK_CLK_MAX, }; -static const char * const mtk_pwm_clk_name[] = { - "main", "top", "pwm1", "pwm2", "pwm3", "pwm4", "pwm5" +static const char * const mtk_pwm_clk_name[MTK_CLK_MAX] = { + "main", "top", "pwm1", "pwm2", "pwm3", "pwm4", "pwm5", "pwm6", "pwm7", + "pwm8" +}; + +struct mtk_pwm_platform_data { + unsigned int num_pwms; }; /**@@ -57,6 +66,11 @@ struct mtk_pwm_chip { struct pwm_chip chip; void __iomem *regs; struct clk *clks[MTK_CLK_MAX]; + const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data *data;
I think you can remove this member since you only use it to initialize chip.npwm, in probe function, just before platform_set_drvdata(). pc->chip.npwm = pc->data->pwm_nums; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+}; + +static const unsigned int mtk_pwm_reg_offset[] = { + 0x0010, 0x0050, 0x0090, 0x00d0, 0x0110, 0x0150, 0x0190, 0x0220 }; static inline struct mtk_pwm_chip *to_mtk_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)@@ -103,14 +117,14 @@ static void mtk_pwm_clk_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) static inline u32 mtk_pwm_readl(struct mtk_pwm_chip *chip, unsigned int num, unsigned int offset) { - return readl(chip->regs + 0x10 + (num * 0x40) + offset); + return readl(chip->regs + mtk_pwm_reg_offset[num] + offset); } static inline void mtk_pwm_writel(struct mtk_pwm_chip *chip, unsigned int num, unsigned int offset, u32 value) { - writel(value, chip->regs + 0x10 + (num * 0x40) + offset); + writel(value, chip->regs + mtk_pwm_reg_offset[num] + offset); } static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,@@ -194,15 +208,20 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!pc) return -ENOMEM; + pc->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
You forgot to check pc->data == NULL (in case device tree inputs are not provided) and you may use here a stack allocated variable to store the number of PWMs returned by of_device_get_match_data(). This is used only for pc->chip.npwm, and anyway, if any, you could get that information from chip.npwm. You could also check here the number of PWMs returned via of_device_get_match_data() to avoid waiting for pwmchip_add() to fail (e.g. if number of PWMs is zero, the pwmchip_add() will fail).
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); pc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); if (IS_ERR(pc->regs)) return PTR_ERR(pc->regs); - for (i = 0; i < MTK_CLK_MAX; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < pc->data->num_pwms + 2; i++) { pc->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, mtk_pwm_clk_name[i]); - if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i])) + if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i])) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clock: %s fail: %ld\n", + mtk_pwm_clk_name[i], PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i])); return PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i]); + } } platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);@@ -210,7 +229,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; pc->chip.ops = &mtk_pwm_ops; pc->chip.base = -1; - pc->chip.npwm = 5; + pc->chip.npwm = pc->data->num_pwms; ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip); if (ret < 0) {@@ -228,9 +247,23 @@ static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip); } +static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt2712_pwm_data = { + .num_pwms = 8, +}; + +static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7622_pwm_data = { + .num_pwms = 6, +}; + +static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7623_pwm_data = { + .num_pwms = 5, +}; + static const struct of_device_id mtk_pwm_of_match[] = { - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-pwm" }, - { } + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-pwm", .data = &mt2712_pwm_data }, + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-pwm", .data = &mt7622_pwm_data }, + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-pwm", .data = &mt7623_pwm_data }, + { }, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_pwm_of_match);
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html