Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: Introduce NVIDIA Tegra20 video decoder driver
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-10-19 20:53:07
Also in:
linux-media, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-10-19 20:53:07
Also in:
linux-media, linux-tegra, lkml
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Osipenko [off-list ref] wrote:
On 18.10.2017 00:13, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Thierry Reding [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: [...]quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vde.txt[...]quoted
quoted
+- resets : Must contain an entry for each entry in reset-names. + See ../reset/reset.txt for details. +- reset-names : Must include the following entries: + - vde-names is pointless when there is only one.I'd prefer to keep it. In the past we occasionally had to add clocks or resets to a device tree node where only one had been present (and hence no -names property) and that caused some awkwardness because verbiage had to be added to the bindings that clarified that one particular entry (the original one) always had to come first.The order should be specified regardless of -names and the original one has to come first if you add any. That's not awkwardness, but how bindings work.Probably it would be okay to remove '-names' from the binding doc, but keep them in the actual DT, wouldn't it?
No. Then where are the names documented? Rob