Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: mt2712: add pintcrl device node.
From: Zhiyong Tao <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-22 01:31:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-mediatek
From: Zhiyong Tao <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-22 01:31:34
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-mediatek
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 14:17 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Zhiyong Tao [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 15:04 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 07/31/2017 10:22 AM, Zhiyong Tao wrote:quoted
The commit includes two change: 1)add pintcrl device node for mt2712. 2)add pinfunc file for mt2712. Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712-pinfunc.h | 1014 +++++++++++++++++++++++++Shouldn't this file be in include/dt-bindings/pinctrl?Only if it is also #included in the driver. Yours, Linus Walleij==> Thanks for your comment. We see our some ICs(mt7623) which move the file to "include/dt-bindings/pinctrl". other ICs(mt2701) which is put in "arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek". In mt2712, mt2712-pinfunc.h is only include by dts file. It won't be included by driver. So which is better? "arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/" or "include/dt-bindings/pinctrl".If it is used in both arm and arm64 it is helpful to have it in include/dt-bindings so it can be shared between the two archs. If it is just (ever) for arm64 it can stay inside the arch tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
==> Thanks for your comment. mt2712-pinfunc.h is only used in arm64. so it can stay inside the arch tree.