Hi Hans,
Thanks for the review!
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 09:27:34AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 09/12/2017 03:41 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
quoted
Add function v4l2_fwnode_reference_count() for counting external
???? There is no function v4l2_fwnode_reference_count()?!
It got removed during the revisions but the commit message was not changed
accordingly, I do that now.
quoted
references and v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse() for parsing them as async
sub-devices.
This can be done on e.g. flash or lens async sub-devices that are not part
of but are associated with a sensor.
struct v4l2_async_notifier.max_subdevs field is added to contain the
maximum number of sub-devices in a notifier to reflect the memory
allocated for the subdevs array.
You forgot to remove this outdated paragraph.
Oops. Removed it now.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
index 44ee35f6aad5..a32473f95be1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
@@ -498,6 +498,75 @@ int v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port(
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port);
+/*
+ * v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse - parse references for async sub-devices
+ * @dev: the device node the properties of which are parsed for references
+ * @notifier: the async notifier where the async subdevs will be added
+ * @prop: the name of the property
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success
+ * -ENOENT if no entries were found
+ * -ENOMEM if memory allocation failed
+ * -EINVAL if property parsing failed
+ */
+static int v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse(
+ struct device *dev, struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
+ const char *prop)
+{
+ struct fwnode_reference_args args;
+ unsigned int index;
+ int ret;
+
+ for (index = 0;
+ !(ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(
+ dev_fwnode(dev), prop, NULL, 0, index, &args));
+ index++)
+ fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);
+
+ if (!index)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ /*
+ * To-do: handle -ENODATA when "device property: Align return
+ * codes of acpi_fwnode_get_reference_with_args" is merged.
+ */
+ if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENODATA)
So while that patch referenced in the To-do above is not merged yet,
what does fwnode_property_get_reference_args return? ENOENT or ENODATA?
Or ENOENT now and ENODATA later? Or vice versa?
I can't tell based on that information whether this code is correct or not.
The comment needs to explain this a bit better.
I'll add this:
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
index a32473f95be1..74fcc3ba9ebd 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-fwnode.c
@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ static int v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse(
/*
* To-do: handle -ENODATA when "device property: Align return
* codes of acpi_fwnode_get_reference_with_args" is merged.
+ * Right now, both -ENODATA and -ENOENT signal the end of
+ * references where only a single error code should be used
+ * for the purpose.
*/
if (ret != -ENOENT && ret != -ENODATA)
return ret;
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html