Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2017-09-04

Re: [PATCH v7 10/18] v4l: async: Introduce macros for calling async ops callbacks

From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Date: 2017-09-04 16:09:00
Also in: linux-media

Hi Hans,

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 03:50:52PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 09/03/2017 07:49 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
quoted
Add two macros to call async operations callbacks. Besides simplifying
callbacks, this allows async notifiers to have no ops set, i.e. it can be
left NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 19 +++++++------------
 include/media/v4l2-async.h           |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
index 810f5e0273dc..91d04f00b4e4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -107,16 +107,13 @@ static int v4l2_async_test_notify(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	if (notifier->ops->bound) {
-		ret = notifier->ops->bound(notifier, sd, asd);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
-	}
+	ret = v4l2_async_notifier_call_int_op(notifier, bound, sd, asd);
Hmm, I think this is rather ugly. We only have three ops, so why not make
three macros:

	v4l2_async_notifier_call_bound/unbind/complete?

Much cleaner than _int_op(...bound...).
Works for me.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help