Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] checks: add phandle with arg property checks
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-24 02:03:38
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:02:06PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted hunk
Many common bindings follow the same pattern of client properties containing a phandle and N arg cells where N is defined in the provider with a '#<specifier>-cells' property such as: intc0: interrupt-controller@0 { #interrupt-cells = <3>; }; intc1: interrupt-controller@1 { #interrupt-cells = <2>; }; node { interrupts-extended = <&intc0 1 2 3>, <&intc1 4 5>; }; Add checks for properties following this pattern. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <redacted> --- v2: - Make each property a separate check - Iterate over raw cells rather than markers - Fix property length check for 2nd to Nth items - Improve error messages. If cell sizes are wrong, the next iteration can get a bad (but valid) phandle. - Add a test checks.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ dtc.h | 1 + livetree.c | 6 +++ tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts | 11 +++++ tests/run_tests.sh | 1 + 5 files changed, 123 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/bad-phandle-cells.dtsdiff --git a/checks.c b/checks.c index afabf64337d5..548d7e118c42 100644 --- a/checks.c +++ b/checks.c@@ -956,6 +956,93 @@ static void check_obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller(struct check *c, WARNING(obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller, check_obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller, NULL); +struct provider { + const char *prop_name; + const char *cell_name; + bool optional;
AFAICT you don't actually use this optional flag, even in the followup patches; it's always false.
+};
+
+static void check_property_phandle_args(struct check *c,
+ struct dt_info *dti,
+ struct node *node,
+ struct property *prop,
+ const struct provider *provider)
+{
+ struct node *root = dti->dt;
+ int cell, cellsize = 0;
+
+ for (cell = 0; cell < prop->val.len / sizeof(cell_t); cell += cellsize + 1) {
+ struct node *provider_node;
+ struct property *cellprop;
+ int phandle;
+
+ phandle = propval_cell_n(prop, cell);
+ if (phandle == 0 || phandle == -1) {
+ cellsize = 0;
+ continue;I'm not clear what case this is handling. If the property has an invalid (or unresolved) phandle value, shouldn't that be a FAIL? As it is we interpret the next cell as a phandle, and since we couldn't resolve the first phandle, we can't be at all sure that it really is a phandle.
+ }
+
+ provider_node = get_node_by_phandle(root, phandle);
+ if (!provider_node) {
+ FAIL(c, dti, "Could not get phandle node for %s:%s(cell %d)",
+ node->fullpath, prop->name, cell);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ cellprop = get_property(provider_node, provider->cell_name);
+ if (cellprop) {
+ cellsize = propval_cell(cellprop);
+ } else if (provider->optional) {
+ cellsize = 0;
+ } else {
+ FAIL(c, dti, "Missing property '%s' in node %s or bad phandle (referred from %s:%s[%d])",
+ provider->cell_name,
+ provider_node->fullpath,
+ node->fullpath, prop->name, cell);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (prop->val.len < ((cell + cellsize + 1) * sizeof(cell_t))) {
+ FAIL(c, dti, "%s property size (%d) too small for cell size %d in %s",
+ prop->name, prop->val.len, cellsize, node->fullpath);
+ }How will this cope if the property is really badly formed - e.g. a 3 byte property, so you can't even grab a whole first phandle? I think it will trip the assert() in propval_cell_n() which isn't great.
quoted hunk
+ } +} + +static void check_provider_cells_property(struct check *c, + struct dt_info *dti, + struct node *node) +{ + struct provider *provider = c->data; + struct property *prop; + + prop = get_property(node, provider->prop_name); + if (!prop) + return; + + check_property_phandle_args(c, dti, node, prop, provider); +} +#define WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(nm, propname, cells_name, ...) \ + static struct provider nm##_provider = { (propname), (cells_name), __VA_ARGS__ }; \ + WARNING(nm##_property, check_provider_cells_property, &nm##_provider, &phandle_references); + +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(clocks, "clocks", "#clock-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(cooling_device, "cooling-device", "#cooling-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(dmas, "dmas", "#dma-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(hwlocks, "hwlocks", "#hwlock-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(interrupts_extended, "interrupts-extended", "#interrupt-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(io_channels, "io-channels", "#io-channel-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(iommus, "iommus", "#iommu-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(mboxes, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(msi_parent, "msi-parent", "#msi-cells", true); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(mux_controls, "mux-controls", "#mux-control-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(phys, "phys", "#phy-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(power_domains, "power-domains", "#power-domain-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(pwms, "pwms", "#pwm-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(resets, "resets", "#reset-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(sound_dais, "sound-dais", "#sound-dai-cells"); +WARNING_PROPERTY_PHANDLE_CELLS(thermal_sensors, "thermal-sensors", "#thermal-sensor-cells"); + static struct check *check_table[] = { &duplicate_node_names, &duplicate_property_names, &node_name_chars, &node_name_format, &property_name_chars,@@ -987,6 +1074,23 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = { &avoid_default_addr_size, &obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller, + &clocks_property, + &cooling_device_property, + &dmas_property, + &hwlocks_property, + &interrupts_extended_property, + &io_channels_property, + &iommus_property, + &mboxes_property, + &msi_parent_property, + &mux_controls_property, + &phys_property, + &power_domains_property, + &pwms_property, + &resets_property, + &sound_dais_property, + &thermal_sensors_property, + &always_fail, };diff --git a/dtc.h b/dtc.h index 409db76c94b7..3c0532a7c3ab 100644 --- a/dtc.h +++ b/dtc.h@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ void append_to_property(struct node *node, const char *get_unitname(struct node *node); struct property *get_property(struct node *node, const char *propname); cell_t propval_cell(struct property *prop); +cell_t propval_cell_n(struct property *prop, int n); struct property *get_property_by_label(struct node *tree, const char *label, struct node **node); struct marker *get_marker_label(struct node *tree, const char *label,diff --git a/livetree.c b/livetree.c index aecd27875fdd..c815176ec241 100644 --- a/livetree.c +++ b/livetree.c@@ -396,6 +396,12 @@ cell_t propval_cell(struct property *prop) return fdt32_to_cpu(*((fdt32_t *)prop->val.val)); } +cell_t propval_cell_n(struct property *prop, int n) +{ + assert(prop->val.len / sizeof(cell_t) >= n); + return fdt32_to_cpu(*((fdt32_t *)prop->val.val + n)); +} + struct property *get_property_by_label(struct node *tree, const char *label, struct node **node) {diff --git a/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts b/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7f7c6a25fd25 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/bad-phandle-cells.dts@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +/ { + intc: interrupt-controller { + #interrupt-cells = <3>; + }; + + node { + interrupts-extended = <&intc>; + }; +};diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh index 3bc5b41ce76d..7cbc6971130a 100755 --- a/tests/run_tests.sh +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ dtc_tests () { check_tests unit-addr-without-reg.dts unit_address_vs_reg check_tests unit-addr-leading-0x.dts unit_address_format check_tests unit-addr-leading-0s.dts unit_address_format + check_tests bad-phandle-cells.dts interrupts_extended_property run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_char.dtb run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_format -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_format.dtb run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh prop_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_prop_char.dtb
-- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes