Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 2 authors, 2017-08-28

Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings

From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date: 2017-08-27 19:39:54
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-serial, lkml

On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 22:00 +0300, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 08/19/2017 09:06 PM, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
quoted
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>

Document the devicetree bindings in 8250.txt for MediaTek BTIF
controller which could be found on MT7622 and MT7623 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt
index 419ff6c..7528d90 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties:
  	  tegra132, or tegra210.
  	- "nxp,lpc3220-uart"
  	- "ralink,rt2880-uart"
+	- For MediaTek MT7623, must contain "mediatek,mt7623-btif"
+	- For other MediaTek SoCs , must contain "mediatek,<chip>-btif",
+	  "mediatek,mt7623-btif" where <chip> is mt7622.
Hm, to me that's confusing. What about:
"mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7623
"mediatek,mt7622-btif", "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7622

If in the future we have more SoCs that support the BTIF, we should add them 
like the mt7622 case.
I had v3, but it should have similar logic and also got ack from Rob

I knew all your logic of adding binding document for all MediaTek
devices, even I alway added MediaTek device in dt-bindings as the way
you mentioned here, but I felt this way is fine for this kind of
dedicated document.

The reason i don't add it as usual is the following. 8250.txt is common
and shared among all uart like devices, so i don't want btif device
occupies too much section and bloat the document when every new MediaTek
SoC is introduced. 

So instead I refer to existing Nvidia device added in 8250.txt  which I
thought its way is simple, elegant and also using pattern I can use to
add btif devices.

	Sean
Make sense?

Regards,
Matthias
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help