Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date: 2017-08-27 19:39:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-serial, lkml
On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 22:00 +0300, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 08/19/2017 09:06 PM, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:quoted
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> Document the devicetree bindings in 8250.txt for MediaTek BTIF controller which could be found on MT7622 and MT7623 SoC. Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt index 419ff6c..7528d90 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties: tegra132, or tegra210. - "nxp,lpc3220-uart" - "ralink,rt2880-uart" + - For MediaTek MT7623, must contain "mediatek,mt7623-btif" + - For other MediaTek SoCs , must contain "mediatek,<chip>-btif", + "mediatek,mt7623-btif" where <chip> is mt7622.Hm, to me that's confusing. What about: "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7623 "mediatek,mt7622-btif", "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7622 If in the future we have more SoCs that support the BTIF, we should add them like the mt7622 case.
I had v3, but it should have similar logic and also got ack from Rob I knew all your logic of adding binding document for all MediaTek devices, even I alway added MediaTek device in dt-bindings as the way you mentioned here, but I felt this way is fine for this kind of dedicated document. The reason i don't add it as usual is the following. 8250.txt is common and shared among all uart like devices, so i don't want btif device occupies too much section and bloat the document when every new MediaTek SoC is introduced. So instead I refer to existing Nvidia device added in 8250.txt which I thought its way is simple, elegant and also using pattern I can use to add btif devices. Sean
Make sense? Regards, Matthias