Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure
From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-02 10:21:43
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 833 bytes
From: Wolfram Sang <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-02 10:21:43
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
quoted
Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving pins" is higher.Indeed, you can use in-band interrupts if your device is able to generate them, but that doesn't prevent I3C device designers from using an external pin to signal interrupts if they prefer.
Exactly. Thus, "We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving pins" is higher" :)