Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] i2c: core: call of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert in i2c_register_adapter
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-23 12:19:23
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-pm
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-23 12:19:23
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-pm
On Jun 19 2017 or thereabouts, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:59:33PM +0800, Phil Reid wrote:quoted
Add a call to of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert when a i2c adapter is registered so the the smbalert driver can be registered. Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <redacted>CCing Benjaminquoted
--- drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c index d2402bb..626471b 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/hardirq.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/i2c-smbus.h> #include <linux/idr.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/irqflags.h>@@ -2045,6 +2046,9 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap) dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Failed to create compatibility class link\n"); #endif + res = of_i2c_setup_smbus_alert(adap); + if (res) + goto out_list;
See my concerns in patch 4/10. In addition, shouldn't this be placed before device_register() for the least? pm_runtime_enable() would require a matching pm_runtime_disable(), and device_register() some unregistering behavior too. Cheers, Benjamin
quoted
i2c_init_recovery(adap); -- 1.8.3.1