Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-29

Re: Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: stmmac: support future possible different internal phy mode

From: <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-29 16:46:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml, netdev

在 2017-06-30 00:23,David Miller 写道:
From: Corentin Labbe <redacted>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:01 +0200
quoted
The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT 
phy-mode
and emac_variant/internal_phy.
But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the
same phy mode than the internal one.

By using phy-mode = "internal" we permit to have an external PHY with
the same mode than the internal one.

Reported-by: André Przywara <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <redacted>
Series applied.
I think there's still some problems around for this patchset...
The definition of "internal" is internal *proprietary* PHY, but the
internal PHY of Allwinner SoCs seem to be MII...

See [1].

[1] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-June/516159.html
Please provide a proper "[PATCH 0/n] " header posting next time.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help