Hi Hugues,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:05:38PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1545,15 +1577,22 @@ static int ov965x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
}
static const struct i2c_device_id ov965x_id[] = {
- { "OV9650", 0 },
- { "OV9652", 0 },
+ { "OV9650", 0x9650 },
+ { "OV9652", 0x9652 },
This change does not appear to match with the patch description nor it the
information is used. How about not changing it, unless there's a reason to?
The same for the data field of the of_device_id array below.
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ov965x_id);
+static const struct of_device_id ov965x_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ovti,ov9650", .data = (void *)0x9650 },
+ { .compatible = "ovti,ov9652", .data = (void *)0x9652 },
+ { /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ov965x_of_match);
static struct i2c_driver ov965x_i2c_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = DRIVER_NAME,
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ov965x_of_match),
},
.probe = ov965x_probe,
.remove = ov965x_remove,
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk