Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-22

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/4] pwm: mediatek: fix clk issue

From: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Date: 2017-06-21 12:07:58
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek, linux-pwm, lkml

Hi

comments inline


On 21/06/17 10:11, Zhi Mao wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
1.fix clock control
  - prepare top/main clk in mtk_pwm_probe() function,
    it will increase power consumption
    and in original code these clocks is only prepeare but never enabled
  - pwm clock should be enabled before setting pwm registers
    in function: mtk_pwm_config()

2.fix pwm source clock selection
  - in original code, the pwm output frequency is not correct
    when set bit<3>=1 to PWMCON register.

Signed-off-by: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
---
  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index 5c11bc7..c803ff6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
   * Mediatek Pulse Width Modulator driver
   *
   * Copyright (C) 2015 John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
   *
   * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
   * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
@@ -61,6 +62,40 @@ static inline struct mtk_pwm_chip *to_mtk_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
  	return container_of(chip, struct mtk_pwm_chip, chip);
  }
  
+static int mtk_pwm_clk_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = to_mtk_pwm_chip(chip);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
+		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
Rather than disabling the already prepared clks in each error path and 
then returning, you should use goto err_clk_{top,main,pwm1} in the same 
style as what this patch removes from mtk_pwm_probe()
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void mtk_pwm_clk_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = to_mtk_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
+	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
+	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
+}
+
  static inline u32 mtk_pwm_readl(struct mtk_pwm_chip *chip, unsigned int num,
  				unsigned int offset)
  {
@@ -81,6 +116,8 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
  	struct clk *clk = pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm];
  	u32 resolution, clkdiv = 0;
  
+	mtk_pwm_clk_enable(chip, pwm);
+
  	resolution = NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate(clk);
  
  	while (period_ns / resolution > 8191) {
@@ -91,10 +128,12 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
  	if (clkdiv > 7)
  		return -EINVAL;
  
-	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | BIT(3) | clkdiv);
+	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | clkdiv);
this chunk needs to go into its own patch
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMDWIDTH, period_ns / resolution);
  	mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMTHRES, duty_ns / resolution);
  
+	mtk_pwm_clk_disable(chip, pwm);
+
  	return 0;
  }
  
@@ -102,11 +141,8 @@ static int mtk_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
  {
  	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = to_mtk_pwm_chip(chip);
  	u32 value;
-	int ret;
  
-	ret = clk_prepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	mtk_pwm_clk_enable(chip, pwm);
You need to check the error code here and return if clk enabling failed
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  
  	value = readl(pc->regs);
  	value |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
@@ -124,7 +160,7 @@ static void mtk_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
  	value &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
  	writel(value, pc->regs);
  
-	clk_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm]);
+	mtk_pwm_clk_disable(chip, pwm);
  }
  
  static const struct pwm_ops mtk_pwm_ops = {
@@ -156,14 +192,6 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  			return PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i]);
  	}
  
-	ret = clk_prepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-
-	ret = clk_prepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		goto disable_clk_top;
-
  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pc);
  
  	pc->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -174,26 +202,15 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
  	if (ret < 0) {
  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add() failed: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_clk_main;
+		return ret;
  	}
  
  	return 0;
-
-disable_clk_main:
-	clk_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_MAIN]);
-disable_clk_top:
-	clk_unprepare(pc->clks[MTK_CLK_TOP]);
-
-	return ret;
  }
  
  static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	unsigned int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pc->chip.npwm; i++)
-		pwm_disable(&pc->chip.pwms[i]);
why are you removing this chunk ?

     John
  
  	return pwmchip_remove(&pc->chip);
  }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help