Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-07 20:38:55
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sudeep Holla [off-list ref] wrote:
+struct scmi_msg_resp_power_attributes {
+ __le16 num_domains;
+ __le16 reserved;
+ __le32 stats_addr_low;
+ __le32 stats_addr_high;
+ __le32 stats_size;
+} __packed;
+
+struct scmi_msg_resp_power_domain_attributes {
+ __le32 flags;
+#define SUPPORTS_STATE_SET_NOTIFY(x) ((x) & BIT(31))
+#define SUPPORTS_STATE_SET_ASYNC(x) ((x) & BIT(30))
+#define SUPPORTS_STATE_SET_SYNC(x) ((x) & BIT(29))
+ u8 name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE];
+} __packed;I think it would be better to leave out the __packed here, which can lead to rather inefficient code. It's only really a problem when building with -mstrict-align, but it's better to write code in a way that doesn't rely on that.
+static int
+scmi_power_domain_attributes_get(struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
+ struct power_dom_info *dom_info)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct scmi_xfer *t;
+ struct scmi_msg_resp_power_domain_attributes *attr;
+
+ ret = scmi_one_xfer_init(handle, POWER_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES,
+ SCMI_PROTOCOL_POWER, sizeof(domain),
+ sizeof(*attr), &t);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ *(__le32 *)t->tx.buf = cpu_to_le32(domain);
+ attr = (struct scmi_msg_resp_power_domain_attributes *)t->rx.buf;
It seems you require a similar pattern in each caller of scmi_one_xfer_init(),
but it seems a little clumsy to always require those casts, so maybe there
is a nicer way to do this. How about making scmi_one_xfer_init() act
as an allocation function and having it return the buffer or a PTR_ERR?
It also seems odd to have it named 'init' but actually allocate the scmi_xfer
structure rather than filling a local variable that gets passed by reference.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html