Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: dts: imx6q-evi: support altera-ps-spi
From: <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-02 19:39:32
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Friday, June 2, 2017 6:30:12 PM PDT Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi, Am 25.05.2017 um 19:29 schrieb Joshua Clayton:quoted
Add support for Altera V FPGA connected to an spi portDid you mean "Altera Cyclone V"?
I meant to shorten it from Altera Cyclone V to Altera FPGA. Didn't quite make it. Will fix and resubmit today.
quoted
to the evi devicetree file Signed-off-by: Joshua Clayton <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-evi.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-evi.dtsb/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-evi.dts index 24fe093a66db..a0cbb2d84803 100644--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-evi.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-evi.dts@@ -82,6 +82,15 @@ pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi1 &pinctrl_ecspi1cs>; status = "okay"; + + fpga_spi: cyclonespi@0 {"cyclonespi" does not strike me as the best node name. I am guessing this is a sub-node of a SPI controller node, so no need to repeat "spi", and Cyclone seems more or less implied by "altr,fpga-".
True.
Note that the example in the bindings doc uses "evi-fpga-spi". Nodes don't need to be (shouldn't be?) prefixed with the board. Note that bindings examples tend to get copied a lot. Any reason not to just use "fpga@0" in both places for simplicity?
Sure. fpga: fpga@0 is probably better. I'll change it in both the dts and the binding doc.
quoted
+ compatible = "altr,fpga-passive-serial"; + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; + reg = <0>; + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fpgaspi>; + nconfig-gpios = <&gpio4 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + nstat-gpios = <&gpio4 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + }; }; &ecspi3 {[snip] Regards, Andreas
-- ~Joshua A Clayton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html