On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:51:24PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
This change introduces a proposed layout for describing FSI busses in
the device tree. While the bus is probe-able, we'd still like a method
of describing subordinate (eg i2c) busses that are behind FSI devices.
The FSI core will be responsible for matching probed slaves & engines to
their device tree nodes, so the FSI device drivers' probe() functions
will be passed a struct device with the appropriate of_node populated
where a matching DT node is found.
Missed this the first time, "dt-bindings: fsi: " is the preferred
subject prefix. No need to respin just for that.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt
Acked-by: Rob Herring <redacted>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html