Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2017-03-21

Re: Question regarding back compatibility for DT

From: Daniel Lezcano <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-21 21:56:46

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:27:37AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Daniel Lezcano
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Rob, dt people,

is it acceptable a driver is changed using a new DT binding but becomes
incompatible with the old DT files ?

IOW, is it possible to change the DT and the driver without supporting the old
DT format, forcing an update of the DT and the kernel ?
If you want a global rule, then no it is not okay. However, it depends
on the platform and it's users. I just ask that breaking compatibility
and why is highlighted in the commit message and the platform
maintainer is okay with it.
Thanks for the clarification. I will ask the maintainer if breaking the
compatibility is ok.

That shows how important is to wisely choose the right binding.

  -- Daniel


-- 

 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help