Am Mittwoch, den 08.03.2017, 10:42 +0100 schrieb Peter Senna Tschudin:

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:27:16PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
Hi Archit,

quoted

Hi,

On 3/3/2017 9:27 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:

quoted

The video processing pipeline on the second output on the GE B850v3:

  Host -> LVDS|--(STDP4028)--|DP -> DP|--(STDP2690)--|DP++ -> Video output

Each bridge has a dedicated flash containing firmware for supporting the
custom design. The result is that in this design neither the STDP4028
nor the STDP2690 behave as the stock bridges would. The compatible
strings include the suffix "-ge-b850v3-fw" to make it clear that the
driver is for the bridges with the firmware which is specific for the GE
B850v3.

The driver is powerless to control the video processing pipeline, as the
two bridges behaves as a single one. The driver is only needed for
telling the host about EDID / HPD, and for giving the host powers to ack
interrupts.

queued Patches 1,2 and 3 to drm-misc-next. Made stdp2690_get_edid static
in Patch #3 to fix a sparse warning.

What about 4/4, aka the dt change? Do I need an ack from Rob Herring?

Thanks a lot!

This one needs to go through Shawn Guo. Now that the driver and binding
are in it is probably best to ask him directly to pick it up.

Regards,
Lucas