On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:06:02PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Priit Laes [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

SMARC-sAMX6i is a SMARC (Smart Mobility Architecture) compliant
module.

Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 434 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e3d7a35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-smarc-sam6xi.dtsi

@@ -0,0 +1,434 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2017 Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org>
+ *
+ * Based on initial work by Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko at dev.rtsoft.ru>
+ *
+ * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
+ * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
+ * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
+ * whole.
+ *
+ *  a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ *     modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ *     published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
+ *     the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ *     This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ *     but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ *     MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ *     GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * Or, alternatively,
+ *
+ *  b) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
+ *     obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
+ *     files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
+ *     restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
+ *     copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
+ *     sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
+ *     Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
+ *     conditions:
+ *
+ *     The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
+ *     included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+ *
+ *     THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
+ *     EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
+ *     OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
+ *     NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
+ *     HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
+ *     WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
+ *     FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
+ *     OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

Use SPDX tags here:

SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)

While it says X11, this is really MIT license text.

No.  Read the FSF's page on licenses:

   X11 License (#X11License)
...
           This license is sometimes called the MIT license, but that term is
           misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software.

Never use the term "MIT license", it's ambiguous, and I doubt that such
a term (given the above) would stand up in a court of law as identifying
any particular license.

The SPDX tags have a very exact, documented meaning. That's the point.
X11 means this[1]. MIT means this[2].

Rob

[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html#licenseText
[2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html#licenseText