Re: bug in DT docs vs mcp251x.c driver
From: Janusz Użycki <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-22 07:58:43
Also in:
linux-can
From: Janusz Użycki <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-22 07:58:43
Also in:
linux-can
Hi Fabio. You are right. Thanks. According to the source code printf adds the "-supply" indeed. I've not verified the code as I got a report for 3.14 that the driver does not work with vdd-supply in DT, works with vdd property and the supply was verified electrically. Now I have to investigate the problem better. best regards Janusz W dniu 2017-02-21 o 19:47, Fabio Estevam pisze:
Hi Janusz, On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Janusz Użycki [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, We've noticed the inconsistency in DT which still exist in kernel v4.10: devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vdd") in drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c vs vdd-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN controller. in bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251x.txtThis is correct. When the regulator is retrieved as devm_regulator_get(dev, "xyz") then it searches for a xyz-supply in the dts.