On 28 February 2017 at 21:46, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Rafał Miłecki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 28 February 2017 at 21:31, Jon Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -70,10 +70,19 @@
clocks = <&periph_clk>;
};
- local-timer@20600 {
+ timer@20600 {
Is there a reason for this rename? I don't really have preference for
any name, it's just we shouldn't keep renaming this depending of
personal preferences.
It also doesn't seem like adjusting to any schema:
bcm63138.dtsi uses local-timer@1e600
bcm-nsp.dtsi uses twd-timer@20600
berlin2cd.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
berlin2q.dtsi uses local-timer@ad0600
This was a suggestion from Sergei Shtylyov
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395160.html
Good to know, thanks!
--
Rafał
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel