Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings

On 26-02-17, 14:18, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

Hi.


Decumentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
takes examples like this:

        opp@1000000000 {
                opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
                opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
                opp-microamp = <70000>;
                clock-latency-ns = <300000>;
                opp-suspend;
        };
        opp@1100000000 {
                opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
                opp-microvolt = <980000 1000000 1010000>;
                opp-microamp = <80000>;
                clock-latency-ns = <310000>;
        };
        opp@1200000000 {
                opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
                opp-microvolt = <1025000>;
                clock-latency-ns = <290000>;
                turbo-mode;
        };


If we follow this notation and the device-tree is built with W=1,
DTC warns like follows:


Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
unit name, but no reg property


Is there a recommended notation to avoid it?

Maybe, simply omit the "@" ?

I would let Rob suggest something here.

-- 
viresh