On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni
[off-list ref] wrote:

(adding Hans-Christian)

On 21/02/2017 at 13:02:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

Abusing platform data with pointers is also not welcome.

quoted

(in this case, avr32).

It's dead de facto.

When last time did you compile kernel for it? What was the version of kernel?
Did it get successfully?

v4.10-rc3 was building successfully but had some issues in the network
code.

Newer kernel doesn't link...

quoted

When are we going to remove avr32 support from kernel completely?

Ask that to the avr32 maintainers. It still builds and is still booted
by some people. And that actually seems to be you as you reported a bug
we introduced in 4.3. I don't think we had any other report after that.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9505727/

After that I gave up on it. Next time I will escalate directly to
Linus. It's a complete necrophilia. I spent already enough time to
look at that code. It brings now more burden than supports someone
somewhere.

It can be frustrating at times to handle that platform but if it is
working for someone, I don't see why we would remove it.

How it's working if it's not linked?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html