RE: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qoriq: Separate root input clock for core PLLs on ls1012a

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Wood [mailto:oss@buserror.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:37 AM
To: Y.T. Tang <redacted>; mturquette@baylibre.com
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org; robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qoriq: Separate root input clock for core PLLs on
ls1012a

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 13:47 +0800, yuantian.tang@nxp.com wrote:

quoted

From: Tang Yuantian <redacted>

ls1012a has separate input root clocks for core PLLs versus the
platform PLL, with the latter described as sysclk in the hw docs.
If a second input clock, named "coreclk", is present, this clock will
be used for the core PLLs.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c | 91
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----

Why did you reset the author on these patches?  Have you changed anything?
 Why aren't they marked either v2 or resend?

I should have marked as v2 or resend. If anything changed, I take it over and dropped the 2/3 patch in your original patch set to speed up the merge, which I think so.
This patch set blocks other patches and 20 days passed, no any action on it. We can't account on you to push it. That's why I take it over and resend it.

All in all, what you suggest to do to make them get accepted ASAP?

Regards,
Yuantian

-Scott