RE: [PATCH v2 05/12] Document: dt: binding: imx: update pinctrl doc for imx6sll
From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
Date: 2017-01-23 07:17:30
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio
From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo@kernel.org]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Another thing is that we can use a pins-tool program developed by NXP to generate the pinctrl configuration code that can be used directly in dts. This tiny program can avoid pin function conflict. As on i.MX, there are so may pins, each pin can be used for up 8function.quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Configuring the pins is a time-consuming work. This tools is very useful forcustomer to generate the dts code. I understand, but every silicon vendor has such a tool, all are different, proprietary and unfriendly to programmers and open source developers, who need to understand how the hardware is working without magic tools and secret data sheets to fix bugs. For the people working with maintaining the code it is paramount that DTS files are self-descriptive.OK. Thanks for your comments. Adding generic-pinconf in imx pinctrl needs some time to finish and the legacy method still need be hereeven if generic-pinconf is added.quoted
quoted
Do you plan to pick this legacy binding patch for now?As I said earlier:quoted
atleast I need an indication from one of the i.MX maintainers how they want to proceed.Sorry for being late for the discussion. To be honest, I did not really expect so many i.MX6 variants coming to us. Just out of curiosity, are there any more in the pipeline to come, or is this the last known one?
AFAIK, this should be the last variant of i.MX6. But not the last one of i.MX family.
I understand that there are now more generic support available at pinctrl core level for us to use than the time we initial designed i.MX pinctrl driver. But I intend to agree with Jacky that imx6sll can be supported by the existing driver, since it doesn't require any additional driver changes. If any new generation of i.MX family require changes on the existing pinctrl driver, we should probably push back for a redesign to use generic support as much as possible. @Jacky, how does i.MX8 pinctrl look like? How same or different as/from i.MX6 pinctrl?
i.MX8 kernel support is in development stage. The code has not been finalized. For now, i.MX8 shares most of the pinctrl code with i.MX6 and use the same pinconfig method.
Just my opinion. Shawn