Re: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: da8xx: Use the right dma controller
From: Tony Lindgren <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-09 18:43:52
Also in:
linux-omap
* Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] [170109 10:30]:
Hello! On 01/09/2017 07:38 PM, Alexandre Bailon wrote:quoted
da8xx driver is registering and using the cppi dma controller but actually, the da8xx has a cppi41 dma controller. Update the driver to register and use the cppi41 dma controller. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> --- drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c index e89708d..74dcc07 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c@@ -458,14 +458,14 @@ static inline u8 get_vbus_power(struct device *dev) } static const struct musb_platform_ops da8xx_ops = { - .quirks = MUSB_DMA_CPPI | MUSB_INDEXED_EP,Grr, MUSB_DMA_CPPI is certainly wrong! There's no CPPI 3.0 support for DA8xx. Where have this come from?quoted
+ .quirks = MUSB_DMA_CPPI41 | MUSB_INDEXED_EP, .init = da8xx_musb_init, .exit = da8xx_musb_exit, .fifo_mode = 2, -#ifdef CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI_DMA - .dma_init = cppi_dma_controller_create, - .dma_exit = cppi_dma_controller_destroy,Likewise, WTF? I suggest that you fix this crap in a separate commit, to be backported to -stable if needed.
Probably came from my DMA patch 7f6283ed6fe8 ("usb: musb: Set up function
pointers for DMA"). At that point I thought da8xxx.c and davinci.c are just
separate attempts of the same driver.. Sorry the number of musb glue layers
is just too confusing.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html