Re: [PATCH v4 i2c/for-next] i2c: rcar: Add per-Generation fallback bindings
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2016-12-02 14:59:51
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-renesas-soc
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that it's not clear what the relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a descendant of the former or vice versa. We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation. For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme is being adopted for drivers for Renesas SoCs. Also: * Deprecate renesas,i2c-rcar. It seems poorly named as it is only compatible with R-Car Gen 1. It also appears unused in mainline. * Add some text to describe per-SoC bindings Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rcar.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rcar.txt
+ "renesas,i2c-r8a7779" if the device is a part of a R8A7797 SoC.
R8A7779
Sorry for not noticing before.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds