On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:35:16PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:30:54PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:

quoted

Hi,

Am 27.11.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:

quoted

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:54:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:

quoted

Found while reviewing Marvell dsa bindings usage.

Hi Andreas

It is good practice to put the maintainer you expect to accept the
patch on the To: line. You have at least two different maintainers on
Cc: so it is currently ambiguous. And these lists can be high volume,
so without a copy in the maintainers inbox, patches can be overlooked.

As a vf610 DT patch with LAKML in To I am expecting it to be handled by
Shawn or anyone from the NXP/ARM side.

So please have Shawn as To:

The patch you are fixing went through Dave Miller, who is also on Cc:,
hence the ambiguity.

The good practice was broken from the beginning when patch "arm: vf610:
zii devel b: Add support for switch interrupts") went through net tree,
even without me on copy.

Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html