Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] i2c: designware: enable SLAVE in platform module
From: Luis Oliveira <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-28 16:42:15
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On 28-Dec-16 16:31, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 15:53 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:quoted
On 28-Dec-16 15:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 14:43 +0000, Luis Oliveira wrote:quoted
- Slave mode selected in platform module (devicetree support only) - Check for ACPI - not supported in SLAVE mode: - Changed the ifndef style to the use of ACPI_HANDLE that returns NULL if the device was not enumerated from ACPI namespace.I'm not sure what is wrong with ACPI?I dont have a way to test it. Just that.Okay, can you provide an excerpt to see how it will look like in DTS?
Yes, it looks like this now:
i2c@0x2000 {
compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg = <0x2000 0x100>;
clock-frequency = <400000>;
clocks = <&i2cclk>;
interrupts = <0>;
eeprom@64 {
compatible = "linux,slave-24c02";
reg = <0x40000064>;
};
};quoted
quoted
quoted
- dev->functionality = I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR | DW_IC_DEFAULT_FUNCTIONALITY; - - i2c_dw_configure_master(pdev); + if (ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev) == NULL) {I don't think you need this at all.This is to avoid the use of the "ifdef" style I used before.My point is to drop it completely.quoted
quoted
quoted
+ device_for_each_child_node(&pdev->dev, child) {This is resource agnostic.quoted
+ fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®);This is as well.Are you suggesting I use of_ functions?Nope. See above.