Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Add missing CPU frequencies for Exynos5422/5800
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-12-16 07:37:29
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:52:58PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
quoted
[ I added Arjun to Cc:, maybe he can help in explaining this issue (unfortunately Inderpal's email is no longer working). ] Please also note that on Exynos5422/5800 SoCs the same ARM rail voltage is used for 1.9 GHz & 2.0 GHz OPPs as for the 1.8 GHz one. IOW if the problem exists it is already present in the mainline kernel.Interesting. In the ChromeOS tree I see significantly higher voltages needed... Note that one might naively look at <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5420-cpufreq.c#178>. 1362500, /* L0 2100 */ 1312500, /* L1 2000 */ ..but, amazingly enough those voltages aren't used at all. Surprise! I believe that the above numbers are actually not used and the ASV numbers are used instead. See <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.8/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/asv-exynos542x.h#452> { 2100000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1350000, 1337500, 1325000, 1312500, 1300000, 1287500, 1275000, 1262500, 1250000, 1237500 }, I believe that interpretation there is: some bins of the CPU can run at 2.1 GHz just fine at 1.25 V but others need up to 1.35V.
That is definitely the case. One could just look at vendors ASV table
(for 1.9 GHz):
{ 1900000, 1300000, 1287500, 1262500, 1237500, 1225000, 1212500,
1200000, 1187500, 1175000, 1162500, 1150000,
1137500, 1125000, 1112500, 1112500},
The theoretical difference is up to 1.875V! From my experiments I saw
BIN1 chips which should be the same... but some working on 1.2V, some on
1.225V (@1.9 GHz). I didn't see any requiring higher voltages but that
does not mean that there aren't such...
...so if you're running at 2.1 GHz at 1.25V then perhaps you're just running on a CPU from a nice bin?
Would be nice to see a dump of PKG_ID and AUX_INFO chipid registers along with name of tested board. Because the "Tested on XU3" is not sufficient. Best regards, Krzysztof