Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2016-12-06

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: add DT binding for S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-12-06 23:13:21
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, lkml

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:48:45AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 12/02/2016 09:14 AM, Sergio Prado wrote:
quoted
Adds the device tree bindings description for Samsung S3C24XX
MMC/SD/SDIO controller, used as a connectivity interface with external
MMC, SD and SDIO storage mediums.

Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <redacted>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3f044076e69a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+* Samsung's S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller device tree bindings
+
+Samsung's S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller is used as a connectivity interface
+with external MMC, SD and SDIO storage mediums.
+
+This file documents differences between the core mmc properties described by
+mmc.txt and the properties used by the Samsung S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller
+implementation.
+
+Required SoC Specific Properties:
+- compatible: should be one of the following
+  - "samsung,s3c2410-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2410
+  - "samsung,s3c2412-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2412
+  - "samsung,s3c2440-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2440
+- clocks: Should reference the controller clock
+- clock-names: Should contain "sdi"
+
+Required Board Specific Properties:
+- pinctrl-0: Should specify pin control groups used for this controller.
+- pinctrl-names: Should contain only one value - "default".
I'm not sure but i think this description doesn't need at here.
quoted
+
+Example:
+	sdi: sdi@5a000000 {
I think it needs to use "mmc0: sdi@5a000000" instead of "sdi: sdi@5a000000"
Because mmc is more clear than sdi.
The label doesn't matter much as it is not part of the dtb. The unit 
name should be 'mmc' though.

With that,

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help