Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: add DT binding for S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-12-06 23:13:21
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, lkml
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:48:45AM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
On 12/02/2016 09:14 AM, Sergio Prado wrote:quoted
Adds the device tree bindings description for Samsung S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller, used as a connectivity interface with external MMC, SD and SDIO storage mediums. Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3f044076e69a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/samsung,s3cmci.txt@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +* Samsung's S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller device tree bindings + +Samsung's S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller is used as a connectivity interface +with external MMC, SD and SDIO storage mediums. + +This file documents differences between the core mmc properties described by +mmc.txt and the properties used by the Samsung S3C24XX MMC/SD/SDIO controller +implementation. + +Required SoC Specific Properties: +- compatible: should be one of the following + - "samsung,s3c2410-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2410 + - "samsung,s3c2412-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2412 + - "samsung,s3c2440-sdi": for controllers compatible with s3c2440 +- clocks: Should reference the controller clock +- clock-names: Should contain "sdi" + +Required Board Specific Properties: +- pinctrl-0: Should specify pin control groups used for this controller. +- pinctrl-names: Should contain only one value - "default".I'm not sure but i think this description doesn't need at here.quoted
+ +Example: + sdi: sdi@5a000000 {I think it needs to use "mmc0: sdi@5a000000" instead of "sdi: sdi@5a000000" Because mmc is more clear than sdi.
The label doesn't matter much as it is not part of the dtb. The unit name should be 'mmc' though. With that, Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>