On 12/06/2016 02:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:39:40PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:

quoted

I come with below RFC patch. if no objection I'll move forward with it.

Thanks for following through with this!

The am335x will also need the MUX in its clock tree, won't it?

Not exactly. I do not see CPTS_RFTCLK_SEL register in trm, but looks like
it's already implemented in am335 clock tree:
	cpsw_cpts_rft_clk: cpsw_cpts_rft_clk@520 {
		#clock-cells = <0>;
		compatible = "ti,mux-clock";
		clocks = <&dpll_core_m5_ck>, <&dpll_core_m4_ck>;
		reg = <0x0520>;
	};

and ssigned-clock-xx can be used to change parent in board file:

&cpsw_cpts_rft_clk {
assigned-clocks = <&cpsw_cpts_rft_clk>;
assigned-clock-parents = <&dpll_core_m4_ck>;
};


-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html