Hi Venkat,

[auto build test ERROR on ulf.hansson-mmc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc5]
[cannot apply to next-20161114]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ritesh-Harjani/mmc-sdhci-msm-Add-clk-rates-DDR-HS400-support/20161114-142815
base:   https://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc next
config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=arm 

Note: the linux-review/Ritesh-Harjani/mmc-sdhci-msm-Add-clk-rates-DDR-HS400-support/20161114-142815 HEAD baef00575b049e246cebd910c417f34cada20ee0 builds fine.
      It only hurts bisectibility.

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c: In function 'sdhci_msm_execute_tuning':

quoted

drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c:498:3: error: 'msm_host' undeclared (first use in this function)

      msm_host->tuning_done = true;
      ^~~~~~~~
   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c:498:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

vim +/msm_host +498 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c

   492			dev_dbg(mmc_dev(mmc), "%s: No tuning point found\n",
   493			       mmc_hostname(mmc));
   494			rc = -EIO;
   495		}
   496	
   497		if (!rc)
 > 498			msm_host->tuning_done = true;
   499		return rc;
   500	}
   501	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation