Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-12-02

Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / Domains: Introduce domain-performance-state binding

From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-28 18:31:03
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On 11/23/2016 08:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 23-11-16, 18:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
quoted
On 11/23, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted
Vincent Guittot [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On 23 November 2016 at 16:51, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Then, at least for this use case, we're talking about voltage, not some
unspecified units.
In some cases we actually know the voltage of the domain and
would want to put some voltage mapping in DT. For example, level
1 is voltage 2V and level 2 is voltage 2.5V.
But even in these cases we wouldn't be using the voltage values within the
kernel as we will be giving only a performance state to the M3 core, right?
Nope. In these cases we need to set a certain voltage and we do that by
requesting it via the M3 core.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help