Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 3 authors, 2016-11-15

Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mm: remove x86-only restriction of movable_node

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-15 07:05:59
Also in: linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml

Reza Arbab [off-list ref] writes:
In commit c5320926e370 ("mem-hotplug: introduce movable_node boot
option"), the memblock allocation direction is changed to bottom-up and
then back to top-down like this:

1. memblock_set_bottom_up(true), called by cmdline_parse_movable_node().
2. memblock_set_bottom_up(false), called by x86's numa_init().

Even though (1) occurs in generic mm code, it is wrapped by #ifdef
CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE, which depends on X86_64.

This means that when we extend CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE to non-x86 arches,
things will be unbalanced. (1) will happen for them, but (2) will not.

This toggle was added in the first place because x86 has a delay between
adding memblocks and marking them as hotpluggable. Since other arches do
this marking either immediately or not at all, they do not require the
bottom-up toggle.

So, resolve things by moving (1) from cmdline_parse_movable_node() to
x86's setup_arch(), immediately after the movable_node parameter has
been parsed.

Considering that we now can mark memblock hotpluggable, do we need to
enable the bottom up allocation for ppc64 also ?

Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <redacted>
---
 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c             | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help