Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] mm: remove x86-only restriction of movable_node
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-15 07:05:59
Also in:
linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Reza Arbab [off-list ref] writes:
In commit c5320926e370 ("mem-hotplug: introduce movable_node boot
option"), the memblock allocation direction is changed to bottom-up and
then back to top-down like this:
1. memblock_set_bottom_up(true), called by cmdline_parse_movable_node().
2. memblock_set_bottom_up(false), called by x86's numa_init().
Even though (1) occurs in generic mm code, it is wrapped by #ifdef
CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE, which depends on X86_64.
This means that when we extend CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE to non-x86 arches,
things will be unbalanced. (1) will happen for them, but (2) will not.
This toggle was added in the first place because x86 has a delay between
adding memblocks and marking them as hotpluggable. Since other arches do
this marking either immediately or not at all, they do not require the
bottom-up toggle.
So, resolve things by moving (1) from cmdline_parse_movable_node() to
x86's setup_arch(), immediately after the movable_node parameter has
been parsed.Considering that we now can mark memblock hotpluggable, do we need to enable the bottom up allocation for ppc64 also ?
Signed-off-by: Reza Arbab <redacted> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
-aneesh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>