Re: [REGRESSION] "console: don't prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path" breaks console on video outputs of various ARM boards
From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2016-11-08 09:18:51
Also in:
lkml
Hi, On 07-11-16 18:16, Paul Burton wrote:
Hi Hans, On Sunday, 6 November 2016 11:54:35 GMT Hans de Goede wrote:quoted
quoted
What I see in my systems, and what 05fd007e4629 ("console: don't prefer first registered if DT specifies stdout-path") addressed, is that if there are for example 2 UARTs uart0 & uart1 that are probed in that order and stdout-path indicates that we should use uart1 we wind up essentially ignoring it because> the ordering of the relevant calls goes: - of_console_check() for uart0 - add_preferred_console() for uart0 - register_console() for uart0 - of_console_check() for uart1 - add_preferred_console() for uart1 - register_console() for uart1 Since of_check_console() doesn't get called for uart1 until after uart0 has been probed, we don't add an entry for it to the console_cmdline array until after register_console() has already decided to enable uart0 because preferred_console == -1. I'm not the only one seeing this oddity either, for example see the discussion on this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9263753/ By simply reverting my patch you restore us to a position where so far as I can see we simply do not honor stdout-path for the real kernel console.As said before, we do still honor it, but in your probe example we also get a (second) serial console on uart0, where as you only want one on uart1....but don't we only support one console per type of device? That's what Documentation/serial-console.txt says anyway, which means having a console on both uart0 & uart1 does not work. I could live with having console output on an extra UART, but that's not what I was seeing when I wrote this patch.
Ah yes, you're probably right about that.
quoted
So I see a few possible solutions here: 1) Do a new version of your patch which changes the "&& !of_specified_console" check to "&& (newcon == tty0 || !of_specified_console)", then we would still always register tty0 (as long as it gets registered first, just like now) and we would not register uart0 in your above example, note the "newcon == tty0" check in my example is pseudo-code. I would be happy to try out such a patch 2) Add a new dt property to enable the new behavior you seek I'm myself tending towards 1 as a better solution: treat tty0 special, because some existing setups rely on it always being registered as a console even if stdout-path is specified and otherwise always honor stdout-path. Regards, HansThat does feel a little hack-ish to me though... I don't like the reliance on probe ordering, nor special casing tty0 in general.
Given that we've just got a "me too" reply from the ppc side of things, it seems that in reality people have been relying on probe ordering here for a long time now. IMHO tty0 is special, so it does make sense that it always gets probed first (*) and it does make sense to handle it special. *) Even though that seems to be more how things work (an implicit thing) rather then explicit.
In any case I don't think I have the time to unpick all this at the moment, so I suggest we go ahead with your revert for now & I'll revisit the system I was working on when I find the time.
Ok. Regards, Hans