Hi Linus,

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 13:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Andrew Jeffery [off-list ref]
wrote:

quoted

Two LPC-related signals in the AST2400 depend on state in the
SuperIO IP
block. Use the recently added infrastructure to capture this
relationship.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <redacted>

Patch applied for v4.10.
(Tell me if I'm applying patches in wrong order or something, and
I hope this doesn't clash with the fixes.)

Both this patch and 8/8 functionally depend on 5/8. I fetched the
pinctrl tree to poke around but this patch didn't appear in any of the
updated branches, so I'm not sure whether we have the right ordering.
Without it we should hit build failures from missing macro definitions.

Have you had a chance to look over patch 5/8? Joel wasn't keen on its
current form, so I would appreciate your input.

Cheers,

Andrew

Yours,
Linus Walleij